Hiring Economics OS
See where hiring economics are actually constrained
Connect acquisition cost, vacancy exposure, recruiter capacity and offer-to-join evidence before changing budget. Every result is arithmetic from your inputs—not a performance score.
Comparable cohort inputs
Use one period or role cohort. Jobiba caps downstream counts to their supplied parent cohort for analysis; reconcile impossible combinations before acting.
Connected decision view
Hiring economics signals
Cost / hire
₹60,000
Cost / retained
₹72,000
Vacancy / open role
₹50,000
Offer acceptance
75.0%
Accepted → joined
80.0%
Capacity load
128.6%
Capacity gap
4
Offers not accepted
5
Accepted not joined
3
Hires not retained
2
Exposure context
4 open roles exceed supplied recruiter capacity; capacity may constrain throughput before sourcing spend does.
Supplied open-role load is 129% of stated recruiter capacity. Treat this as workload arithmetic, not recruiter performance.
Supplied vacancy exposure is 1.3× hiring spend for this cohort; compare time-to-fill interventions before assuming more acquisition spend is the best lever.
The recommended next workspace follows supplied arithmetic constraints. It does not diagnose cause, rank people or automate hiring decisions.
How to use this workspace
- Enter one comparable hiring period or cohort.
- Keep unknown fields blank rather than estimating them silently.
- Review the surfaced arithmetic constraint.
- Open the recommended specialist workspace and validate with deeper evidence.
Decision boundary
This tool does not infer candidate quality, recruiter performance, source causality or future hiring outcomes. It is a planning layer that connects observed or employer-supplied aggregates.
Hiring economics FAQs
What does Hiring Economics combine?
Employer-supplied aggregate hiring spend, hires, open roles, vacancy exposure, capacity and offer-stage counts. It does not score candidates or recruiters.
Does the calculator identify the cause of a hiring problem?
No. It highlights arithmetic constraints and routes you to a deeper workspace. Use comparable evidence before making causal claims.
Why use cost per retained hire?
Headline cost per hire can look efficient even when few hires remain in the cohort. Retained-hire cost keeps that trade-off visible.